Clement Deleersnyder vs Niklas Waldner Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L W L L W L
Form
L W W W L W W W L LHead To Head: Deleersnyder 1 - 0 Waldner
They have played 2 sets in total, with Deleersnyder winning 2 and Waldner winning 0. The last match between Deleersnyder and Waldner was at the M15 Monastir, 08-10-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Clement Deleersnyder getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Clement Deleersnyder | 1 |
| Niklas Waldner | 0 |
M15 Monastir(08-10-2023)
6
3
6
1
| Deleersnyder | Stats | Waldner |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 70% (28-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 23 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 50% (29-29) | Career Total W/L | 50% (108-109) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Zandschulp VS Struff PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Deleersnyder VS Waldner H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 | |||||
Deleersnyder VS Waldner H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Clement Deleersnyder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Mikail Alimli
Player
Clement Deleersnyder
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
19%
(
11 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
56
|
6-7(4) 6-2 10-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Deleersnyder
Player
Mateo Bivol
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Cazacu
Player
Clement Deleersnyder
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Louis Van Herck
Player
Clement Deleersnyder
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
52)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Deleersnyder
Player
Romain Faucon
43%
(
25 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 3-6 7-5 11-9 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-6 7-5 10-8 | H2H | |||
view more
Niklas Waldner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Niklas Waldner
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niklas Waldner
Player
Keoni Puig Mccallan
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
18 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamish Stewart
Player
Niklas Waldner
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niklas Waldner
Player
Eric Jr. Olivarez
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
8
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
0
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
16 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Faris Zakaryia
Player
Niklas Waldner
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50% (29/29) | Win/Loss | 50% (108/109) |
| 54% (68/59) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (237/242) |
| 51% (605/588) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (2274/2299) |
| 54% (21/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (72/51) |
| 40% (4/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 40% (36/54) |
| 44% (4/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 42 | Aces Total | 333 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 78 | Total Double Faults | 235 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 259.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 191.41 |
| 61% (809/1336) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3868/6458) |
| 62% (501/809) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2629/3868) |
| 47% (247/527) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1239/2590) |
| 60% (61/102) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (192/523) |
| 39% (478/1229) | Return Points Win % | 36% (2237/6287) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (29/29) | Futures W/L | 50% (108/107) |
| 52% (29/56) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (108/216) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 88% (7/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (21/44) |
| 23% (3/13) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (25/46) |
| 83% (35/29) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (101/93) |
| 17% (35/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (101/8) |
| 0% (23/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (116/15) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
